工大后院

 找回密码
 加入后院

扫一扫,访问微社区

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
查看: 793|回复: 0

模拟考官赖劲松对2011年1月15日A类的考题的点评

[复制链接]
发表于 2011-2-25 16:50 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
January 15th, (A) Nowadays, some workplaces are trying to employ equal numbers of male and female workers. Do you think this is a positive or negative development.
三刀解题法:
一刀对比:men VS women ; past VS today ( 由development推断出来),两对对比相结合就
变成: more men were employed in the past VS equal numbers of men and women are employed
当然也有more women were employed in some workplaces in the past的情况,反正就不是equal.
二刀focus: a positive or negative development
角度:没有,但要特别注意有一个程度词----equal!
参考的coherence:
Introduction: 背景信息+ 点题,不表明立场;
Body1: a positive development ----对比过去more men were employed in the past 和现在equal numbers of men and women are employed,主要讨论gender equality à a fair society. employment没有sex discrimination .这是positive development.
Body2: a negative development ----抓住equal狂贬!对比men and women的characteristics and
competence, 毕竟是有所不同的,不是所有的workplaces都适合hire equal numbers, 有的需
要更多的males,而另一些需要更多的females. 工作的岗位的安排应该以相应的personality
去找雇员,而不是一定要same numbers of men and women. 所以这个policy可能会导致
inefficient and ineffective. For this reason, 是negative development.

My view is that gender discrimination must be eliminated, but the practice expressed can only be
implemented in a certain number of areas where gender differences do not play a significant role,
in task fulfillment. After all, the differences are real and can never be denied. Therefore, for my
part, it is very difficult to say whether such an implementation is a positive or negative
development.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 加入后院

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|广告业务Q|工大后院 ( 粤ICP备10013660号 )

GMT+8, 2025-5-13 14:36

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

Copyright © 2001-2024 Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表